FastBreed Technologies, Inc.   
 
Where Things Work Right


** New ideas added 01/01/05 starting at number 132.

   132. Fish Movies -

              Let your stories tell themselves.

              Never say 'you should have seen the size of the one that got away' when you can say 'hey, take a look at the size of
              the one that got away'.  A new camera based on the colonoscopy pill camera could make this happen.  The camera
              would be disguised as a weight (or lure if you want to see the innards), and start filming the minute the fish struck and
              you hit the record button.  If the fish got away you could then play back the tape to show all of your friends you
              weren't lying.  A bonus feature would be a weight calculator that could figure out how much the fish weighed based
              on the dead weight during times when you were pulling it in and it wasn't fighting back.
 

   133. Fair Market Monopoly -

              Who cares where Marvin Gardens is?

              This new electronic version of the monopoly game would have a GPS in it so it would know where you were
              playing when you turned it on.  The game would do a quick search of the property appraiser's office in your area
              and give the spots real names based on the values in your locale.  At least then you'd know what you were playing
              for.  (I guess it would stink if your house turned out to be the cheapest spot though.)

              Since it's an electronic version you could also have driveways coming out of each property that linked up with a
              network of roads.  That way when you bought a house the board would sense its presence and generate a random
              reaction from the former owners as they drove off.  (We'd need a couple thousand potential reactions in the database
              to keep it interesting and unpredictable.)
 

   134. Floating Doctors -

              This idea mainly applies to the U.S. where doctors are leaving the profession because they can't afford to pay the
              high malpractice premiums. One of the major reasons the premiums are so high is because insurance companies have
              to set aside a bundle of cash in case they have to pay off ridiculously high court judgments.

              Here's the idea. There are two piles of money being collected now, premiums from companies/employees to get
              regular insurance, and premiums from doctors to get malpractice insurance. A new company would offer to cut the
              size of both payments in half. It could do so because its costs would be cut in the following manner.

              Routine medical care would continue to be provided the way it is now by doctors who joined the company in return
              for the reduction in their malpractice premiums (the premiums would be paid to this new company). If a patient
              needed surgery though they'd be ferried out to a ship sitting in international waters for it (like casino gambling boats
              do now). Since the operation was outside the U.S. borders the doctors couldn't be sued in U.S. courts thereby
              saving the new company lawyers fees and those huge malpractice awards.

              Now and then a doctor would still do something wrong though. To protect the patient in that case a nine person
              board would decide whether the doctor was guilty. This board would have 2 doctors on it, 2 investigative reporters,
              and 5 students who had been given full scholarships to the schools of their choice (and who didn't major in either law
              or medicine).  The students, having already been given non-revocable scholarships by the new company, could be
              impartial and would be the majority. This would insure that the patient got a fair hearing. If the doctor was found guilty
              the patient would then receive an amount in damages based on the rates originally agreed to when they signed up for
              this insurance plan with their employer.

              When discussing this idea with other people some questions kept repeatedly coming up so I've listed the most
              common ones and their answers in more detail below.

                 1. How does the board find guilt or innocence?  The two doctors on the board would perform a peer review the
                     same way it's done in hospitals now. The doctors would come from the pool of physicians who signed up for
                     the program and would be chosen on a case by case basis to make sure they had the same qualifications as the
                     doctor being investigated. The investigative reporters are there to get whatever additional information might be
                     needed.

                 2. What methods are used?  Doctors signing up for the program would agree to give the board full access to their
                      records for the operation in question, and any previous operations that had been challenged. The whole
                      9-member board would review these records and make a decision the same way juries do. (The doctor being
                      investigated would be allowed to defend himself too.)

                 3. What authority is exercised?  The board would just note minor mistakes in a file so during the doctor's annual
                      evaluation they could help the reviewers decide if an accumulation of mistakes warranted dropping the doctor
                      from the program.  In cases of extreme malpractice, the doctor would be immediately dropped from the
                      program and a complete history of the case would be sent to the licensing authority in his state.

                 4. How are punishments enforced?  See question 3.

                 5. What rights to access do you suggest?  If by access you mean who can join this type of insurance program, it
                      would be available to any employee whose employer offered it.  Geography would be a consideration.  It would
                      probably only be cost-effective in locations with easy access to a coastline.

                 6.  How is this funded?  There would primarily be two sources of funding - the malpractice premiums coming from
                      doctors (who decided to join the program because these premiums would be 50% less than whatever they're
                      currently paying), and the employee payroll deductions made by those who joined the plan.  Not that the truly
                      wealthy would need it, but they could join as private-pay clients.  Self-employed businessmen would also have
                      the same option.
 

   135. Robot Ball Boy -

              We've got robot vacuum cleaners and robotic lawn mowers to help get the work done, it's time we made a robot
              to help get the playing done. A simple modification to one of those roomba's could make it recognize tennis balls at
              rest in a 5 foot strip along the outside edge of a tennis court and pick them up. Periodically it would return to a
              bucket near the playing area and dump all of the collected balls into it.
 

   136. Peg Leg Prisoner Control -

              Decreasing violence via Joint Cuffs.

              Whenever a new prisoner entered the prison system he or she would be outfitted with a new kind of cuff.  A ring
              near the ankle would be narrow enough to keep it from being slipped off, and a ring above the knee would hold the
              other end of two metal rods attached to the lower ring.  The combination of rods and rings would force the inmates
              to walk peg leg style, thus stopping them from running around and kicking other inmates/staff.  The same kind of cuffs
              would run from the wrist to the elbow.  One of these cuffs would have a keyed joint though so it could be unlocked
              as needed for dining or bathroom breaks.  (The keyed cuff should be put on the arm that the patient doesn't normally
              use, further decreasing their punching power.)  The rings on all of the cuffs could be moved up or down a few inches
              and snapped in different positions so sores wouldn't develop.

              Picture a prison full of young Forrest Gumps and you'd have a pretty close approximation of this idea.
 

   137. eSpecies -

              An auction for the benefit of science.

              There's never enough money for science (unless it relates to weapons research). Auctioning off the names of new
              species might provide a new source of funding. Right now whenever a new species is found, and we're finding them
              all the time, it's often given a name referring in some way to the person who found it. These discoverers might be just
              as satisfied with 10 percent of whatever an auction could bring in, especially if they've already had some bug named
              after them. The other 90 percent could then go towards funding more explorations. As to whether or not there would
              be willing buyers, the fact that people pay to have stars named after themselves and friends when those names don't
              hold any official weight proves there's a market out there. The market would be even bigger for something like this,
              especially when the names would be official and stuck in every catalog of species from now until the end of man.
 

Return to Home Page


Google

Contact Information

newideas@fastbreed.com

support@fastbreed.com
 

Back to Top
 


©Copyright 1/13/2000
Last revised: December 16, 2004.